Attorneys for the Surfrider Foundation made final remarks during closing arguments in the Martin’s Beach trial today (July 16, 2014) before San Mateo County Superior Court Judge Barbara J. Mallach. It is now up to Judge Mallach to consider the evidence presented and render her decision. The outcome of this case will set a precedent for the future of public access at all beaches along our coasts. The Foundation expects a ruling from the court by mid-September.
“We delivered a very strong closing argument today,” says Angela Howe, Legal Director for the Surfrider Foundation. “Surfrider brought this litigation to protect the public’s right of beach access, which is of the utmost importance for this precious spot on the San Mateo County coast and for all of California’s 1,100-mile coastline.”
Mark Massara, longtime surfer and counsel for the Surfrider Foundation in this matter, was present today for the closing remarks with Eric Buescher and Joseph Cotchett of Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, who also represented Surfrider in the case before Judge Mallach.
The lead attonery was our special guest on this week’s Off The Lip Radio Show to discuss the the corporate battle of private private property rights vs public beach access at Martin’s Beach:
“Let’s be crystal clear: even if one were to believe the tall tales that Vinod Khosla’s lawyers told today, and assume that everything they said about how the U.S. Government and Coastal Commission cannot be trusted, it would not change the fact that Khosla still has to apply for a permit,” declares Massara.
The Surfrider Foundation, the largest non-profit organization dedicated to protecting the world’s oceans, waves and beaches, challenged that the property owner, billionaire venture capitalist Vinod Khosla, violated the California Coastal Act when he closed the only public access road to Martin’s Beach by putting up a gate and posted signage to deter visitors. (Complete timeline, here.)
Although an affirmative decision by the court would not restore public access directly, it would require the property owner to seek a permit for the development that has occurred and begin a public process to consider the changes to the property and beach access. A decision in favor of Surfrider might also require the property owner to pay hefty fines of up to $15,000 per day into the state Coastal Conservancy coffers.
“We believe the judge will make a very informed, reasonable judgment. It is clear that Mr. Khosla refused to go to the Coastal Commission and we are asking the court to order him to do so,” adds Joseph Cotchett, counsel for the Surfrider Foundation.
Meanwhile, in the state legislature, a bill is still in play that also seeks to restore public access to Martin’s Beach. SB 968 (Hill – San Mateo) would direct the State Lands Commission to work to negotiate purchase of an easement or right-of-way to facilitate public access to the beach. If no such purchase is negotiated by 2016, the Commission could opt to exercise its existing eminent domain to acquire the easement. The bill will be considered by the Assembly Appropriations Committee when the legislature reconvenes in August.
For more information on the campaign, including a timeline, please visit martinsbeach.blogspot.com.
Watch this live interview with Massara, from last night on Off The Lip Radio Show which is streamed on TheSurfChannel.com, about the battle of private property rights vs. public beach access at Martin’s Beach.
About Surfrider Foundation
The Surfrider Foundation is a non-profit grassroots organization dedicated to the protection and enjoyment of our world’s oceans, waves and beaches through a powerful activist network. Founded in 1984 by a handful of visionary surfers in Malibu, California, the Surfrider Foundation now maintains over 250,000 supporters, activists and members worldwide. For more information on the Surfrider Foundation, visit www.surfrider.org.